The Sixth Neural Computation and Psychology Workshop (NCPW6) (eds.) (2008).įROM ASSOCIATIONS TO RULES: Connectionist Models of Behavior and Cognition Singapore: World Scientific can Proceedings of this Workshop: (French, R. Was held in Dijon, France, and was organized by Bob French and Xanthi Skoura-Papaxanthis. The Tenth Neural Computation and Psychology Workshop (NCPW10 Total Amount of the Grant: 980,000 euros,ĭuration: 4 years + 1 year extension. (European Commission 5th Framework project HPRN-CT-1999-00065) Of Learning and Forgetting in Natural and Artificial Systems Robert French & Valerie Camos, Project Co-coordinators The Limits of Co-currence Analyses (Région de Bourgogne) Humans - The Analogy Making Species (European Commission Sixth (European Commission Sixth Framework: NEST no. There is more information available about the project, you can get it by clicking on the project name.įrom Associations To Rules In The Development Of Concepts (FAR) It can be seen by clicking on the project name above the abstract. If more information about the project is available, On the West Coast of Ireland.In a zone ofĪctive lava flows on The Big Island, Hawaiiīy clicking here you can see an abstract about the project. Turing Test), analogy-making, computational models of evolution. Tel: +33 (0)3 80 39 39 65 / 57 81Įmail: robert dot french round-at-sign u-bourgogne dot fr no-spacesĪreas of research: Connectionist modeling, catastrophic interference,Ĭategorization in children and infants, bilingualism, foundations of cognitive science (esp. The two tests yield different results, and the first provides a more appropriate measure of intelligence.Adm. Although the first, neglected, test uses a human’s linguistic performance in setting an empirical test of intelligence, it does not make behavioral similarity to that performance the criterion of intelligence. I show here that the first test described in that much-discussed paper is in fact not equivalent to the second one, which has since become known as ‘the Turing Test’. In ‘Computing Machinery and Intelligence’, Alan Turing actually proposed not one, but two, practical tests for deciding the question ‘Can a machine think?’ He presented them as equivalent. SterrettApril1999TuringsTwoTestsForIntelligenceBJPS.docx Microsoft Word (Turing's Two Tests for Intelligence - April '99 Draft)
0 kommentar(er)
